<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Ways Google Can Help Prevent Terrorism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/563/7-ways-google-can-prevent-terrorism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/563/7-ways-google-can-prevent-terrorism/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of Spork Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Norrie</title>
		<link>http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/563/7-ways-google-can-prevent-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-6991</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Norrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/?p=563#comment-6991</guid>
		<description>Bob Baer was a CIA officer who wrote an autobiography.  He was operations, not data collection.  There is a huge copyediting error in that a/b. He says h joked with Mr McKee about the possibility of the terrorists getting him in June 1989, by the strapline clearly says it was in August of that year.  

McKee was to die on Pan Am 103. Did the CIA have some foreknowlege of his death?  If so why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Baer was a CIA officer who wrote an autobiography.  He was operations, not data collection.  There is a huge copyediting error in that a/b. He says h joked with Mr McKee about the possibility of the terrorists getting him in June 1989, by the strapline clearly says it was in August of that year.  </p>
<p>McKee was to die on Pan Am 103. Did the CIA have some foreknowlege of his death?  If so why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/563/7-ways-google-can-prevent-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/?p=563#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Dragon Blogger - Good call. My thinking here is that Google would only manage the algorithm - Google Inc. would not own or store any data. I also believe that a proper security procedure would reduce or eliminate the possibility of data leaks.

My other thought is that a private intelligence company might have a lot more success stopping terrorism than a big government bureaucracy, and personally I&#039;m comfortable with the notion if it saves lives.

Great comment - thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragon Blogger &#8211; Good call. My thinking here is that Google would only manage the algorithm &#8211; Google Inc. would not own or store any data. I also believe that a proper security procedure would reduce or eliminate the possibility of data leaks.</p>
<p>My other thought is that a private intelligence company might have a lot more success stopping terrorism than a big government bureaucracy, and personally I&#8217;m comfortable with the notion if it saves lives.</p>
<p>Great comment &#8211; thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragon Blogger</title>
		<link>http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/563/7-ways-google-can-prevent-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragon Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sporkmarketing.com/blog/?p=563#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>I agree that Google is in a good place to provide this information, but also as it is a private corporation, the same could be true of providing information about everyone period which can lead to freedom intrusions.

Also as a private company do we want the Government to be so reliant on publicly traded companies for such things?  This in itself can pose risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Google is in a good place to provide this information, but also as it is a private corporation, the same could be true of providing information about everyone period which can lead to freedom intrusions.</p>
<p>Also as a private company do we want the Government to be so reliant on publicly traded companies for such things?  This in itself can pose risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
